The Ability to Look: Management of Breast Disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Using Smart Ultrasound Technology.

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of women with breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa present with advanced stage disease, due primarily to the lack of opportunities for early detection and treatment. As part of a larger effort to increase access to diagnostic and therapeutic services for women's cancers in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), we implemented a curriculum to train the local workforce and a program to build the supportive infrastructure for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer at a private sector health facility (Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital) in Kinshasa. STUDY DESIGN: After onsite trainings in the DRC by a US breast surgeon (RT), Congolese surgeons, general physicians, physician assistants, and nurses used the Phillips Lumify smart-phone ultrasound device to perform and interpret the results of whole breast ultrasound on symptomatic women. Surgeons were trained to perform ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy on those who met the criteria for tissue diagnosis, after which they trained nurses to do the same. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 5,211 patients were identified as having a breast abnormality on clinical breast examination. Ultrasound abnormalities were noted in 1,493 (27%) patients, of which 632 (42%) met the criteria for ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy or fine needle aspiration. Pathology reports were available on 368 (58%) patients who underwent biopsy, of which 164 were malignant and 204 benign. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated how the "ability to look" using smart technology can be successfully used to augment clinical breast exam and triage patients for biopsy in a resource-constrained African setting.

Is thyroid core needle biopsy a valid compliment to fine-needle aspiration?

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has long been considered the first and an important diagnostic tool in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. The advantages of FNA include simplicity, safety, cost-effectiveness, high diagnostic accuracy, and low complication rate. Nevertheless, limitations associated with FNA include a substantial rate of inconclusive results and indeterminate interpretations. Therefore, core needle biopsy (CNB) of the thyroid gland has been proposed as a complementary or even alternate diagnostic method to evaluate thyroid nodules. Although controversial, a growing number of researchers have reported CNB to be an effective and safe sampling method for thyroid nodules, especially for cases with inadequate or indeterminate FNA yields. Skeptics highlight local pain and bleeding risk. Supporters highlight the potential likelihood of overcoming FNA limitations by obtaining a larger amount of tissue and using architecture and cellular details to guide possible ancillary testing. This review evaluates the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of CNB as compared with FNA of the thyroid gland.

Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Freehand versus 3-Dimensional Template Mapping Biopsy Using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Device in Biopsy Naïve Men.

PURPOSE: Targeted prostate biopsy devices include a 3-dimensional digital template grid to guide systematic biopsy locations. Following a template could better ensure uniform and well distributed sampling of the prostate compared to the traditional freehand biopsy approach, possibly decreasing the chance of false-negative biopsy. Thus, we determined cancer detection rates obtained by conventional freehand systematic sampling vs template mapping sampling using a magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men who underwent first line conventional or image guided prostate biopsy were identified retrospectively in an institutional review board approved protocol. Excluded from study were men with prior biopsy or treatment or fewer than 10 cores taken. Targeted cores obtained by image guided biopsy were censored from analysis to simulate systematic template biopsy. The resulting cancer detection rate was compared to that of conventional biopsy. RESULTS: We identified 1,582 patients between 2006 and 2014 who met the criteria for analysis, including 1,052 who underwent conventional biopsy and 530 who underwent template biopsy with a magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion device. Patient age, prostate specific antigen and the number of systematic cores were the same in the 2 groups. Template biopsy detected any prostate cancer in 257 of 530 men (48.5%) and clinically significant cancer in 196 (37.0%) while conventional biopsy detected any cancer in 432 of 1,052 (41.0%) (p=0.005) and clinically significant cancer in 308 (29.2%) (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Template mapping systematic biopsy detected more prostate cancer than conventional sampling in biopsy naïve men. It is a promising cost-effective alternative to magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy as an upfront screening tool.

Periprostatic nerve block alone versus combined with perineal pudendal nerve block or intrarectal local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety and cost of combinations of perineal pudendal nerve block + periprostatic nerve block and intrarectal local anesthesia + periprostatic nerve block with the standard technique (periprostatic nerve block). METHODS: The study was designed as a randomized prospective controlled trial. Patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen values (prostate-specific antigen ≥4 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings were included in the study. Patients with anorectal diseases, chronic prostatitis, previous history of prostate biopsy and anorectal surgery were excluded from the study. A total of 148 patients (group 1 [periprostatic nerve block], n = 48; group 2 [intrarectal local anesthesia + periprostatic nerve block], n = 51; group 3 [perineal pudendal nerve block + periprostatic nerve block], n = 49) were included in the final analysis. Pain during insertion and manipulation of the transrectal ultrasound probe was recorded as visual analog scale 1, pain during penetration of the biopsy needle into the prostate and sampling was recorded as visual analog scale 2, and pain during the entire procedure recorded as visual analog scale 3. RESULTS: The mean visual analog scale 1 score was significantly lower in group 3, when compared with group 1 and group 2 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the mean visual analog scale 2 score. The mean visual analog scale 3 score was significantly lower in group 3 when compared with other groups (P < 0.001). The total cost for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in the intrarectal local anesthesia + periprostatic nerve block group was significantly higher than the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of perineal pudendal nerve block and periprostatic nerve block provides more effective pain control than intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block and periprostatic nerve block alone, with similar complication rates and without increasing cost.

Cost-effectiveness of hydrogel plugs in CT-guided lung biopsies. / Estudio de coste-efectividad sobre la utilización de un tapón de hidrogel en las biopsias pulmonares guiadas por tomografía computarizada.

OBJECTIVE: Using a hydrogel plug decreases the number of cases of pneumothorax and reduces the need for pleural drainage tubes in CT-guided lung biopsies. We aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of using hydrogel plugs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 171 lung biopsies divided into three groups: Group 1 (n=22): fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) without hydrogel plugs; Group 2 (n=89): FNAC with hydrogel plugs; and Group 3 (n=60): FNAC plus core-needle biopsy (CNB) with hydrogel plugs. We calculated the total costs (direct and indirect) in the three groups. We analyzed the percentage of correct diagnoses, the average and incremental rations, and the most cost-effective option. RESULTS: Total costs: Group 1 = 1,261.28 + 52.65 = € 1,313.93; Group 2 = 1,201.36 + 67.25 = € 1,268.61; Group 3 = 1,220.22 + 47.20 = € 1,267.42. Percentage of correct diagnoses: Group 1 = 77.3%, Group 2 = 85.4%, and Group 3 = 95% (p = 0.04). Average cost-effectiveness ratio: Group 1 = 16.99; Group 2 = 14.85; and Group 3 = 13.34. CONCLUSIONS: Group 3 was the best option, with the lowest average cost-effectiveness ratio; therefore, the most cost-effective approach is to do FNAC and CNB using a dehydrated hydrogel plug at the end of the procedure.

Cutting Healthcare Costs with Hematoma-Directed Ultrasound-Guided Breast Lumpectomy.

BACKGROUND: Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) remains highly variable and includes needle/wire localization (NL), radioactive seed localization, radar localization, and hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) lumpectomy. The superiority of HUG lumpectomy over NL has been demonstrated repeatedly in terms of safety, accuracy, low positive margin rates, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction. In this study, we evaluate the cost effectiveness of HUG lumpectomy over NL for nonpalpable breast lesions. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 569 patients who underwent lumpectomy at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences from May 2014 through December 2017. Lumpectomies were stratified by localization technique, i.e. NL versus HUG. A cost-savings estimate was determined for the HUG localization technique, and a total amount of dollars saved over the study period was calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 569 lumpectomies were performed: 501 (88.0%) via HUG and 68 (12.0%) via NL. Intraoperative ultrasound was used in 566 operations (99.5%). Of the lumpectomies performed by HUG, 190 lesions (33.4%) were visible only on mammogram or breast magnetic resonance imaging prior to diagnostic core needle biopsy (CNB). Cost estimates comparing HUG with NL demonstrated a cost savings of $497.00 per procedure, the cost of preoperative needle localization by a radiologist, and a total of $94,430.00 for the study period. CONCLUSION: In utilizing HUG lumpectomy, the initial CNB serves as the diagnostic and localization procedure, thus saving time and a painful second procedure on the day of operation. HUG lumpectomy is safe, accurate, reduces healthcare costs, and results in a better patient experience for the surgical removal of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Rentabilidad diagnóstica de la biopsia con aguja gruesa guiada por técnicas de imagen del mesenterio y del peritoneo / Diagnostic performance of imaging-guided core needle biopsy of the mesentery and peritoneum

Objetivo. Evaluar la rentabilidad de la biopsia percutánea con aguja gruesa guiada por técnicas de imagen de nódulos e infiltración difusa del omento o del peritoneo. Material y métodos. Se evalúan retrospectivamente 57 pacientes a los que se realizó una biopsia con aguja gruesa del peritoneo o del omento entre marzo de 2014 y enero de 2017. La tomografía computarizada (TC) al diagnóstico se empleó para planificar la biopsia. Los resultados se clasificaron en diagnósticos (benignos/malignos) o no concluyentes (muestra insuficiente). Se calcularon la sensibilidad, la especificidad y el valor predictivo positivo y negativo. Se analizó si la muestra fue diagnóstica según la técnica de imagen empleada (TC o ecografía) y el tipo de afectación del omento-peritoneo biopsiada (masa, nódulo o infiltración difusa). Resultados. El 100% de las biopsias percutáneas fueron diagnósticas. La sensibilidad de la técnica fue del 98,18% y la especificidad fue del 100%. El valor predictivo positivo fue del 100% y el negativo fue del 50%. Tanto las muestras obtenidas con guía por TC (10) como las guiadas por ecografía (47) fueron diagnósticas. Así mismo, las biopsias de masas (24), nódulos (17) e incluso de infiltración difusa (16) del peritoneo-omento permitieron el diagnóstico histológico. La tasa de complicaciones fue del 1,75% (una muerte). Conclusión. La biopsia percutánea con aguja gruesa es una técnica con una alta sensibilidad independientemente de la técnica de imagen empleada como guía de la punción (TC o ecografía) y del tipo de lesión biopsiada (masa, nódulo o infiltración difusa). Es una técnica útil con escasa tasa de complicaciones, aunque a veces pueden ser graves

Objective. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of imaging-guided core needle biopsy of nodules and diffuse infiltration of the omentum or of the peritoneum. Material and methods. We retrospectively evaluated 57 patients who underwent core needle biopsy of the peritoneum or of the omentum between March 2014 and January 2017. We used computed tomography (CT) to plan the biopsy. Biopsies were guided by CT or ultrasonography (US). We classified the results as diagnostic (benign / malignant) or inconclusive (inadequate sample). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative predictive value. We analyzed whether the specimen was diagnostic depending on the imaging technique used (CT or US) and on the type of omental or peritoneal involvement from which the specimen was obtained (mass, nodule, or diffuse involvement). Results. All (100%) the percutaneous biopsies were diagnostic. The sensitivity of the technique was 98.18% and the specificity was 100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 50%. Both the specimens obtained under CT guidance (n=10) and those obtained under US guidance (n=47) were diagnostic. Likewise, biopsies of masses (n=24), of nodules (n=17), and even of diffuse infiltration (n=16) of the peritoneum or omentum enabled the histologic diagnosis. The rate of complications was 1.75% (one death). Conclusion. Percutaneous core needle biopsy has high sensitivity regardless of the imaging technique used to guide the technique (CT or US) and of the type of lesion biopsied (mass, nodule, diffuse infiltration). It is a useful technique with a very low rate of complications, although severe complications can occur

Targeted biopsy: benefits and limitations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current literature regarding the role of multiparametric MRI and fusion-guided biopsies in urologic practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Fusion biopsies consistently show an increase in the detection of clinically significant cancers and decrease in low-risk disease that may be more suitable for active surveillance. Although, when to incorporate multiparametric MRI into workup is not clearly agreed upon, studies have shown a clear benefit in both biopsy naïve and those with prior negative biopsies in determining the appropriate treatment strategy. More recently, cost-analysis models have been published that show that upfront MRIs are more cost-effective when considering missed cancers and treatment courses. SUMMARY: With improved accuracy over systematic biopsies, fusion biopsies are a superior method for detection of the true grade of cancer for both biopsy naïve and patients with prior negative biopsies, choosing appropriate candidates for active surveillance, and monitoring progression on active surveillance.

Estudio de costo-efectividad de la biopsia mamaria asistida por vacío versus biopsia con aguja gruesa o arpón / The cost effectiveness of vacuum-assisted versus core-needle versus surgical biopsy of breast lesions

Objetivo. Realizar estudio de costo-efectividad de la biopsia por aspiración al vacío (BAV) (9 G) guiada por estereotaxia vertical o ecografía comparada con biopsia con aguja gruesa (BAG) (14 G) y biopsia con arpón. Material y métodos. Analizamos 997 biopsias mamarias (181 BAV, 626 BAG y 190 arpones). Calculamos costes totales (directos e indirectos) de los tres tipos de biopsia. No calculamos costes intangibles. El efecto a medir fue el "porcentaje de diagnósticos correctos" obtenidos con cada una de las técnicas. Calculamos los ratios medios de los tres tipos de biopsias e identificamos la opción dominante más costo-efectiva. Resultados. Costes totales de BAG 225,09 Euros, de BAV 638,90 Euros y de biopsia con arpón 1780,01 Euros. Porcentaje de diagnósticos correctos globales con BAG 91,81%, BAV 94,03% y biopsia con arpón 100%, sin diferencias significativas (p=0,3485). En microcalcificaciones, los porcentajes de diagnósticos correctos fueron con BAG 50% y con BAV 96,77%, p<0,0001. En nódulos tampoco hubo diferencias significativas. El ratio medio costo-efectividad considerando todas las lesiones en conjunto, fue para BAG 2,45, BAV 6,79 y arpón 17,80. Conclusión. La BAG fue la opción dominante para el diagnóstico de lesiones mamarias sospechosas de malignidad en general. En el caso de las microcalcificaciones, el bajo porcentaje de diagnósticos de la BAG (50%) desaconsejan su uso y colocan a la BAV como técnica de elección; la BAV es, además, más costo-efectiva que el arpón, que es la otra técnica indicada para biopsiar microcalcificaciones (AU)

Objectives. To determine the cost effectiveness of breast biopsy by 9G vacuum-assisted guided by vertical stereotaxy or ultrasonography in comparison with breast biopsy by 14G core-needle biopsy and surgical biopsy. Material and methods. We analyzed a total of 997 biopsies (181 vacuum-assisted, 626 core, and 190 surgical biopsies). We calculated the total costs (indirect and direct) of the three types of biopsy. We did not calculate intangible costs. We measured the percentage of correct diagnoses obtained with each technique. To identify the most cost-effective option, we calculated the mean ratios for the three types of biopsies. Results. Total costs were Euros 225.09 for core biopsy, Euros 638.90 for vacuum-assisted biopsy, and Euros 1780.01 for surgical biopsy. The overall percentage of correct diagnoses was 91.81% for core biopsy, 94.03% for vacuum-assisted biopsy, and 100% for surgical biopsy; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.3485). For microcalcifications, the percentage of correct diagnoses was 50% for core biopsy and 96.77% for vacuum-assisted biopsy (p<0.0001). For nodules, there were no significant differences among techniques. The mean cost-effectiveness ratio considering all lesions was 2.45 for core biopsy, 6.79 for vacuum-assisted biopsy, and 17.80 for surgical biopsy. Conclusion. Core biopsy was the dominant option for the diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions in general. However, in cases with microcalcifications, the low percentage of correct diagnoses achieved by core biopsy (50%) advises against its use in this context, where vacuum-assisted biopsy would be the technique of choice because it is more cost-effective than surgical biopsy, the other technique indicated for biopsying microcalcifications (AU)

Ultrasound-Guided Core-Needle Versus Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: A Cost Analysis Based on the American Society of Breast Surgeons' Mastery of Breast Surgery Registry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-efficacy of vacuum-assisted ultrasound-guided breast biopsy instruments compared to ultrasound-guided 14-gauge spring-loaded core-needle biopsy. METHODS: The American Society of Breast Surgeons' Mastery of Breast Surgery Registry was reviewed. Biopsy findings, any rebiopsy, and the instrument used were abstracted for 31,451 ultrasound-guided biopsy procedures performed between 2001 and July 2014. Rates of cancer diagnosis and rebiopsy were calculated for each instrument. A linear mathematical model was developed to calculate total cost per cancer diagnosis, including procedural costs and the costs of any additional surgical rebiopsy procedures. Mean cost per cancer diagnosis with confidence limits was then determined for 14-gauge spring-loaded core-needle biopsy and 14 different vacuum-assisted instruments. For 14-gauge spring-loaded core-needle biopsy, mean cost per cancer diagnosis was $4346 (4327-$4366). For the vacuum-assisted instruments, mean cost per cancer diagnosis ranged from a low of $3742 ($3732-$3752) to a high of $4779 ($4750-$4809). RESULTS: Vacuum-assisted instruments overall were more cost-effective than core with a mean cost per cancer diagnosis of $4052 ($4038-$4067) (p < 0.05). Tethered vacuum-assisted instruments performed best with a mean cost per cancer diagnosis of $3978 ($3964-$3991) (p < 0.05). Nontethered devices had a mean cost per cancer diagnosis of $4369 ($4350-$4388), a result no better than core (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy had a lower mean cost per cancer diagnosis than 14-gauge spring-loaded core-needle biopsy. This advantage was only seen in tethered vacuum-assisted instruments. Within device families, larger instruments tended to outperform smaller instruments.

Reflex estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ER/PR/Her2) analysis of breast cancers in needle core biopsy specimens dramatically increases health care costs.

ER/PR/Her2 are often reflexively assessed in all core needle biopsies (CNBXs) containing invasive mammary carcinoma (IMC) so that neoadjuvant therapy can be considered. ER/PR/Her2 can be heterogenous, and there is growing consensus that negative results for any of these markers in small CNBXs should be repeated in larger excision specimens (EXS). The frequency and added cost of repeat testing of EXS containing untreated IMC with negative ER/PR/Her2 CNBX results has not previously been studied. We reviewed 198 CNBXs containing IMC, which had reflex ER/PR/Her2 testing and for which there was an EXS for review. We determined the number of cases in which ER/PR/Her2 immunohistochemistry and Her2 fluorescence in situ hybridization were negative on CNBX. Twenty-seven (13.6%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 8 (4%) patients did not have IMC on follow-up EXS, so for them testing the CNBX was necessary. Of the remaining 163 IMCs, 17% were ER negative, and 26% were PR negative, whereas 85% were Her2 negative or equivocal. At our institution, ER/PR were repeated on slightly more than one half of ER/PR-negative tumors, whereas Her2 was repeated on less than one third of Her2-negative/equivocal tumors. Had all negative tests been repeated, the increased cost of testing both the CNBX and EXS would be $100,821. Extrapolating to 230,000 new cases of IMC in the United States each year, the increased cost of repeat testing of all negative ER/PR/Her2 CNBX results would be >$117 million dollars. Limiting reflex testing to ER would decrease the cost of repeat testing to $10 million dollars. We suggest that ER/PR/Her2 should not be reflexively performed on all CNBX specimens containing IMC but instead be routinely performed on EXS and only selectively on CNBX specimens if neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a serious consideration for that individual patient.

Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: an analysis of patient contacts and utilization of healthcare resources.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence supports active surveillance (AS) as a means to reduce overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The consequences of close and long-standing follow-up with regard to outpatient visits, tests and repeated biopsies are widely unknown. This study investigated the trajectory and costs of AS in patients with localized PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 317 PCa patients were followed in a prospective, single-arm AS cohort. The primary outcomes were number of patient contacts, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, biopsies, hospital admissions due to biopsy complications and patients eventually undergoing curative treatment. The secondary outcome was cost. RESULTS: The 5 year cumulative incidence of discontinued AS in a competing-risk model was 40%. During the first 5 years of AS patients underwent a median of two biopsy sets, and patients were seen in an outpatient clinic including PSA testing three to four times annually. In total, 38 of the 406 biopsy sessions led to hospital admission and 87 of the 317 patients required treatment for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). With a median of 3.7 years' follow-up, the total cost of AS was euro (€) 1,240,286. Assuming all patients had otherwise undergone primary radical prostatectomy, the cost difference favoured AS with a net benefit of €662,661 (35% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: AS entails a close clinical follow-up with a considerable risk of rebiopsy complication, treatment of BOO and subsequent delayed definitive therapy. This risk should be weighed against a potential economic benefit and reduction in the risk of overtreatment compared to immediate radical treatment.

Diagnostic benefits and cost-effectiveness of on-site imprint cytology adequacy evaluation of core needle biopsies of bone lesions.

BACKGROUND: Core needle biopsy (CNB) is a well-established, successful technique for the diagnosis of various organ system lesions. To increase diagnostic yield, on-site cytologic evaluation of adequacy (OCA) is routinely performed at many institutions. Numerous studies evaluating the impact of OCA on CNB have been published. However, little has been said regarding accuracy of OCA for bone lesions. METHODS: To evaluate this, we reviewed our experience during a two-year period, and compared OCA results with the final diagnosis of the corresponding CNB. For the study, diagnoses were divided into three categories: malignant, benign, and nonspecific/nondiagnostic findings. RESULTS: Sixty-one cases were included. During OCA, 25 cases were diagnosed as malignant, three cases as benign, and 33 as nonspecific/nondiagnostic. On histologic evaluation, 29 cases were malignant, 16 were benign, and 16 were classified as nonspecific/nondiagnostic. Concordance with final CNB diagnosis was seen in 100% of malignant, 67% of benign, and 45% of nonspecific/nondiagnostic on-site cytology evaluations. The overall diagnostic success rate of OCA for malignancy was 86% (25/29). The success rate of OCA for benign lesions was only 13%. Fifty-four percent of cases were diagnosed as nonspecific/nondiagnostic on-site. This category included four false negative cases. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that for lesions with a suspicion of malignancy, OCA is a valuable adjuvant diagnostic tool. However, for cases with a benign or nonspecific clinical impression, OCA has a limited diagnostic role. Careful selection of cases in which OCA is beneficial is necessary to maintain accuracy and to limit procedure costs.

Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast with chondroid differentiation (matrix-producing carcinoma): study of the diagnostic cost-effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and needle core biopsy.

UNLABELLED: Metaplastic carcinoma with chondroid differentiation (MMPC) is a subtype of breast metaplastic carcinoma with mesenchymal differentiation. Although fine-needle aspiration (FNAB) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) are commonly used for the diagnosis of breast cancer, not enough studies proving the diagnostic cost-effectiveness of these techniques for the identification of MMPC have been published so far. The aim of this study was to investigate the concordance between the presurgical diagnosis using FNAB/CNB and the definitive diagnosis in the surgical specimen in pure MMPC. A case of MMPC is also reported. STUDY DESIGN: All cases of MMPC diagnosed in our institution from 1995 to 2011 were reviewed. The presence of chondroid differentiation in cytological studies or biopsies and the proportion of chondroid matrix in the surgical specimen were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 13 cases of pure MMPC were collected. The diagnosis was suspected in 25% of FNABs and was rendered in 40% of CNBs. CONCLUSIONS: The chondroid component in MMPC is hard to identify by FNAB and CNB. The random distribution and proportion of the chondroid differentiation in the tumour and the expertise in performing the technique and in identifying the chondroid component may play an important role in the diagnosis of MMPC using these techniques.